![]() |
|
Original Article
| ||||||
| Which patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with induction chemotherapy are most likely to benefit from post-induction chemoradiotherapy? | ||||||
| Sophie Otter1, Irene Chong2, Ria Kalaitzaki3, Diana Tait2 | ||||||
|
1Clinical Research Fellow, Royal Marsden Hospital, UK 2Consultant Clinical Oncologist, Royal, Marsden, Hospital, UK 3Senior Statistician, Royal Marsden Hospital, UK | ||||||
| ||||||
|
[HTML Full Text]
[PDF Full Text]
[Print This Article] [Similar article in PubMed] [Similar article in Google Scholar] |
| How to cite this article |
| Otter S, Chong I, Kalaitzaki R, Tait D. Which patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with induction chemotherapy are most likely to benefit from post-induction chemoradiotherapy? Int J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis 2018;8:100077Z04SO2018. |
|
ABSTRACT
|
|
Aims: The role of concomitant chemotherapy with radiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is controversial. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of patients with LAPC treated with CRT over a 10-year period within a single institution and to identify those patients who derived the most benefit.
Keywords: Chemoradiotherapy, Pancreatic cancer, PET-CT |
|
[HTML Full Text]
[PDF Full Text]
|
|
Author Contributions
Sophie Otter – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Irene Chong – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Ria Kalaitzaki – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published Diana Tait – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published |
|
Guarantor of Submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission. |
|
Source of Support
None |
|
Conflict of Interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest. |
|
Copyright
© 2018 Sophie Otter et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information. |
|
|